Roughage Sources Added to Beef Cattle

1. Cheng K-J, McAllister T, Popp J, Hristov A, Mir Z, Shin H. A review of bloat in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 1998; 76:299–308. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.761299x

2. Maktabi H, Ghasemi E, Khorvash M. Effects of substituting grain with forage or nonforage fiber source on growth performance, rumen fermentation, and chewing activity of dairy calves. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016; 221:70–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.08.024

3. Ki KS, Park SB, Lim DH, Seo S. Evaluation of the nutritional value of locally produced forage in Korea using chemical analysis and in vitro ruminal fermentation. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017; 30:355–62. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0626

5. Eastridge M, Bucci P, Ribeiro C. Feeding equivalent concentrations of forage neutral detergent fiber from alfalfa hay, grass hay, wheat straw, and whole cottonseed in corn silage based diets to lactating cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009; 150:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.08.008

6. Xu J, Hou Y, Yang H, et al. Effects of forage sources on rumen fermentation characteristics, performance, and microbial protein synthesis in midlactation cows. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014; 27:667–73. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13604

7. Hsu J-T, Faulkner DB, Garleb KA, Barclay RA, Fahey GC, Berger LL. Evaluation of corn fiber, cottonseed hulls, oat hulls and soybean hulls as roughage sources for ruminants. J Anim Sci 1987; 65:244–55. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.651244x

9. Miron J, Yosef E, Maltz E, Halachmi I. Soybean hulls as a replacement of forage neutral detergent fiber in total mixed rations of lactating cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2003; 106:20–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00069-5

10. Adin G, Solomon R, Nikbachat M, et al. Effect of feeding cows in early lactation with diets differing in roughage-neutral detergent fiber content on intake behavior, rumination, and milk production. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92:3364–73. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2078

11. Seo S, Jeon S, Ha J. Guidelines for experimental design and statistical analyses in animal studies submitted for publication in the Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018; 31:1381–6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0468

12. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th rev. edWashington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2000.

13. Lee M, Jeong S, Seo J, Seo S. Changes in the ruminal fermentation and bacterial community structure by a sudden change to a high-concentrate diet in Korean domestic ruminants. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2019; 32:92–102. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0262

14. Jeon S, Sohn K-N, Seo S. Evaluation of feed value of a by-product of pickled radish for ruminants: analyses of nutrient composition, storage stability, and in vitro ruminal fermentation. J Anim Sci Technol 2016; 58:34 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-016-0117-1

15. Fox DG, Tedeschi LO, Tylutki TP, et al. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2004; 112:29–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006

16. Leng RA. Factors affecting the utilization of 'poor-quality' forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutr Res Rev 1990; 3:277–303. https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR19900016

17. Dado R, Allen M. Variation in and relationships among feeding, chewing, and drinking variables for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77:132–44. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76936-8

18. Salinas-Chavira J, Alvarez E, Montaño MF, Zinn RA. Influence of forage NDF level, source and pelletizing on growth performance, dietary energetics, and characteristics of digestive function for feedlot cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2013; 183:106–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.05.004

19. Bhatti S, Firkins J. Kinetics of hydration and functional specific gravity of fibrous feed by-products. J Anim Sci 1995; 73:1449–58. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7351449x

20. Seo S, Tedeschi LO, Lanzas C, Schwab CG, Fox DG. Development and evaluation of empirical equations to predict feed passage rate in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006; 128:67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.09.014

21. Abdelhadi LO, Santini FJ. Corn silage versus grain sorghum silage as a supplement to growing steers grazing high quality pastures: effects on performance and ruminal fermentation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006; 127:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.010

22. Highfill B, Boggs D, Amos H, Crickman J. Effects of high fiber energy supplements on fermentation characteristics and in vivo and in situ digestibilities of low quality fescue hay. J Anim Sci 1987; 65:224–34. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.651224x

23. Poore MH, Moore JA, Swingle RS, Eck TP, Brown WH. Response of lactating Holstein cows to diets carying in fiber source and ruminal starch degradabllity. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76:2235–43. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77560-8

24. Dijkstra J, Mills JA, France J. The role of dynamic modelling in understanding the microbial contribution to rumen function. Nutr Res Rev 2002; 15:67–90. https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR200237

25. Javaid A, Shahzad MA, Nisa M, Sarwar M. Ruminal dynamics of ad libitum feeding in buffalo bulls receiving different level of rumen degradable protein. Livest Sci 2011; 135:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.133

26. Ndlovu T, Chimonyo M, Okoh AI, Muchenje V, Dzama K, Raats JG. Assessing the nutritional status of beef cattle: current practices and future prospects. Afr J Biotechnol 2007; 6:2727–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB2007.000-2436

27. Agenäs S, Heath M, Nixon R, Wilkinson J, Phillips C. Indicators of undernutrition in cattle. Anim Welf 2006; 15:149–60.

28. Doornenbal H, Tong A, Murray N. Reference values of blood parameters in beef cattle of different ages and stages of lactation. Can J Vet Res 1988; 52:99–105.

29. Säkkinen H. Variation in the blood chemical constituents of reindeer: Significance of season, nutrition and other extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Oulu, Finland: Acta Univesitatis Ouluensis; 2005.

30. Reynolds CK, Aikman PC, Lupoli B, Humphries DJ, Beever DE. Splanchnic metabolism of dairy cows during the transition from late gestation through early lactation. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86:1201–17. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73704-7

31. O'Kelly JC. Comparative studies of lipid metabolism in Zebu and British cattle in a tropical environment. II. Blood lipid levels of cattle on different diets. Aust J Biol Sci 1968; 21:1025–32. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9681025

32. Campanile G, Baruselli PS, Vecchio D, et al. Growth, metabolic status and ovarian function in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) heifers fed a low energy or high energy diet. Anim Reprod Sci 2010; 122:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.07.005

33. Van Knegsel AT, Van den Brand H, Dijkstra J, Tamminga S, Kemp B. Effect of dietary energy source on energy balance, production, metabolic disorders and reproduction in lactating dairy cattle. Reprod Nutr Dev 2005; 45:665–88. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2005059

34. Van Knegsel A, Van den Brand H, Dijkstra J, et al. Effect of glucogenic vs. lipogenic diets on energy balance, blood metabolites, and reproduction in primiparous and multiparous dairy cows in early lactation. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:3397–409. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-837

35. Rowlands G. A review of variations in the concentrations of metabolites in the blood of beef and dairy cattle associated with physiology, nutrition and disease, with particular reference to the interpretation of metabolic profiles. World Rev Nutr Diet 1980; 35:172–235.

thompsonabsontrythe42.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.animbiosci.org/journal/view.php?number=24368

Share this post